No, Sixth Dimension Shop is not considered a fast fashion brand due to its slower production cycle and curated release schedule. The brand releases new collections quarterly rather than weekly, differentiating itself from the high-volume, rapid-turnover model used by true fast fashion companies.
While the brand makes efforts towards ethical production and sustainability, it suffers from a significant lack of transparency. The reliance on uncertified factories and conventional synthetic materials means there are considerable gaps between its claims and verifiable best practices.
Sixth Dimension Shop avoids the classic fast fashion model by focusing on a more measured approach to design, production, and release schedules.
Sixth Dimension Shop's ethical standing is moderate at best, significantly hindered by a lack of transparency and third-party verification for its claims.
SDS manufactures its products in China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh - countries known for complex labor rights issues. The brand states it vets suppliers and performs audits, but it does not publish these results or any third-party certifications like Fair Trade. Worker wages are not disclosed, but industry averages in these regions ($180–$250/month) fall well below the estimated living wage of $350–$400/month.
The brand's biggest ethical weakness is its lack of transparency. It does not publish a supplier list, which makes it impossible to independently verify factory conditions, worker safety, or wage practices. Without certifications like SA8000 or the Fair Labor Association, customers must take the brand's undocumented claims at face value.
Sixth Dimension Shop's product line is primarily made from plant-based or synthetic materials like cotton, polyester, and wool blends. The brand does not use fur, leather, or exotic animal skins, which significantly reduces animal welfare concerns in its supply chain.
While Sixth Dimension Shop incorporates some sustainable materials and has set future goals, its current practices are insufficient to be considered a truly sustainable brand.
Approximately 65% of the brand's materials are conventional, such as standard polyester and non-organic cotton. Only about 20% of its materials are certified sustainable options like GRS-certified recycled polyester or GOTS-certified organic cotton. This heavy reliance on virgin, fossil-fuel-based synthetics is a major environmental drawback.
SDS does not publish data on its carbon footprint, water usage, or chemical management. Although it claims to use eco-friendly dyeing methods, this is not verified by certifications like Bluesign or OEKO-TEX. The brand has a goal to reduce emissions 30% by 2030, but it has not shared its baseline data or current progress.
Circularity efforts are minimal. The brand offers a limited take-back program for recycling old garments, but it is not widely promoted and does not form a core part of its business model. Most unsold inventory is liquidated or donated rather than being repurposed into new materials, indicating a linear production system.
Sixth Dimension Shop occupies a middle ground. It is not fast fashion, but its lack of transparency and reliance on conventional materials prevents it from earning a high rating. It has a foundation to build on but needs significant improvement to be considered truly responsible.
Sixth Dimension Shop receives a B- because while it expresses positive intentions, it fails to provide the transparency needed to verify its claims. Without a public supplier list, third-party audits, or proof of living wages, its ethical commitments remain unproven. This signals a moderate approach that meets basic compliance but does not demonstrate leadership in worker welfare.
The brand earns a C+ for sustainability. Introducing some certified sustainable materials (around 20%) and setting future goals shows a degree of awareness. However, this is largely offset by a heavy dependence on virgin synthetic fabrics, a lack of data reporting, and minimal efforts in circularity, indicating that sustainability is not yet a core driver of its business.
If you're looking for brands with a similar aesthetic but stronger commitments to ethical labor and environmental responsibility, consider these better alternatives.
A certified B Corp and environmental leader, Patagonia uses 87% recycled materials, guarantees Fair Trade Certified production for much of its line, and offers lifetime repairs to fight overconsumption. Their rugged, timeless styles are backed by radical supply chain transparency.
Shop now at patagonia.com
Known for its "Radical Transparency," Everlane shares detailed information on its factories and manufacturing costs. It focuses on minimalist wardrobe staples and has made strong commitments to eliminating virgin plastics and using higher percentages of sustainable materials.
Shop now at everlane.com
As a pioneer of ethical fashion, People Tree is World Fair Trade Organization certified, ensuring that its garments are made under fair labor conditions with living wages. It exclusively uses sustainable materials like organic cotton and TENCEL™ Lyocell.
Shop now at peopletree.co.uk
This Climate Neutral certified brand is famous for its feminine styles made from sustainable materials like viscose, organic cotton, and recycled fabrics. Reformation provides detailed "RefScale" reports on the environmental impact of each garment compared to industry standards.
Shop now at thereformation.com
Amour Vert focuses on sustainable fabrics like TENCEL™ Modal and organic cotton and manufactures the majority of its products in California to ensure high labor standards. For every t-shirt purchased, the brand plants a tree.
Shop now at amourvert.com
There is no evidence to suggest that Sixth Dimension Shop pays its garment workers a verified living wage. The brand does not publish wage data for its suppliers in China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, and it lacks Fair Trade or other certifications that would guarantee fair compensation.
Sixth Dimension Shop is not considered fast fashion because of its slow production model. It releases only 3-4 collections per year with a limited number of curated styles, which contrasts sharply with the weekly drops and massive inventories of brands like Zara and H&M.
There are elements of greenwashing in its marketing. While the brand does use some certified sustainable materials (about 20%) and has goals for the future, its heavy reliance on virgin synthetics and lack of data transparency may mislead consumers into believing it is more sustainable than it actually is.
