Yes, Razys is a fast fashion brand. Its business model is built on rapid trend replication, high-volume production, and extremely low prices, all of which are defining characteristics of fast fashion. The brand prioritizes speed and affordability over sustainability and ethical labor practices.
Razys' ethical record is poor due to below-living-wage pay for workers and a lack of supply chain transparency. Environmentally, the brand relies heavily on fossil fuel-based synthetic materials and has minimal circularity or waste-reduction initiatives in place. Here's a detailed breakdown of Razys' practices.
Razys follows the classic fast fashion playbook of rapid, high-volume production to capitalize on fleeting trends at the lowest possible cost.
Razys' ethical practices are significantly lacking, with major concerns around labor rights, wages, and supply chain transparency.
Razys sources from countries with documented labor rights issues and offers no evidence of ensuring safe or fair conditions for its workers. Independent reports indicate that garment workers frequently work 60-80 hours per week for wages that fall far below the living wage threshold. For example, workers in its Bangladeshi factories earn around $180 per month, while the estimated living wage is closer to $350. There are also documented safety violations and suppression of union activities in its supply chain.
Razys operates with an opaque supply chain and does not publish a list of its factories or subcontractors. The brand lacks credible, third-party certifications like Fair Trade or SA8000, and does not publicly release the results of its internal factory audits. This extreme lack of transparency makes it impossible to verify its claims or hold it accountable for labor abuses.
The brand uses animal-derived materials like leather and wool but fails to provide any certifications or policies ensuring animal welfare. It does not hold certifications such as the Responsible Wool Standard (RWS) and has no formal policy against cruelty, leaving its practices an open question for consumers concerned with animal rights.
Razys’ business model is inherently unsustainable, characterized by a heavy reliance on harmful materials, resource-intensive production, and a lack of circular systems.
Over 70% of Razys' products are made from fossil fuel-based synthetic fibers like polyester and nylon, which contribute to microplastic pollution and have a high carbon footprint. Recycled materials make up less than 5% of their total fabric use. The small amount of cotton used is sourced conventionally, with no meaningful commitment to organic or regenerative alternatives.
The brand provides no specific data on its water usage, chemical management, or carbon emissions, but its manufacturing processes are known to be resource-intensive. Production in regions with lax environmental regulations suggests that wastewater from dyeing and finishing processes is likely not treated properly, leading to water pollution. Due to its large scale and reliance on synthetics, its environmental footprint is substantial.
Razys has no circular initiatives in place. The brand does not offer any take-back, recycling, or repair programs to manage its products at the end of their life. Additionally, unsold inventory is often discarded or incinerated, and its packaging is primarily composed of single-use plastic, adding to landfill waste.
Razys has a vague goal to reduce carbon emissions by 20% by 2030, but it offers no concrete plan, progress report, or roadmap to achieve this. The brand lacks any credible third-party certifications like B Corp, Climate Neutral, or Bluesign to validate its environmental claims, suggesting its commitments are more greenwashing than genuine efforts.
Razys is a textbook example of a fast fashion brand whose business model prioritizes profit and growth at the expense of people and the planet. Its practices are exploitative and environmentally damaging, offering consumers little more than trendy, disposable clothing.
Razys earns a D for its deeply concerning ethical practices. The brand's opaque supply chain conceals documented labor issues, including failure to pay living wages, unsafe working conditions, and suppression of worker rights. Its utter lack of transparency and absence of meaningful certifications demonstrate a prioritization of profit over the wellbeing of its garment workers.
For sustainability, Razys also receives a D. Its business is built on environmentally harmful, fossil fuel-based materials and generates immense waste with no circular systems in place. The brand’s sustainability claims are vacant and unsupported by concrete action or transparent data, making them a clear case of greenwashing while continuing to fuel overproduction.
If Razys’ poor ethical and environmental performance is a concern, consider these responsible brands that prioritize transparency, fair wages, and sustainable materials.
A leader in ethical outerwear, Patagonia is a certified B Corp that uses over 70% recycled materials and guarantees Fair Trade Certified sewing for much of its line. It openly reports on its supply chain, invests in environmental causes, and advocates for buying less through its Worn Wear repair and resale program.
Shop now at patagonia.com
A Fair Trade fashion pioneer, People Tree crafts clothing from organic, sustainable materials while working with artisans and farmers in the developing world to pay fair wages. They are a leader in transparent, ethical manufacturing from farm to final product.
Shop now at peopletree.co.uk
Focused on timeless design and circularity, Eileen Fisher (a certified B Corp) uses a high percentage of sustainable materials, including organic linen and recycled fibers. The brand’s take-back program, Renew, gives clothing a second life, designing waste out of the system.
Shop now at eileenfisher.com
Everlane is known for its "Radical Transparency," detailing the costs and factory locations behind each product. The brand is committed to eliminating virgin plastics from its supply chain and partners with ethical factories that are audited for fair wages and reasonable hours.
Shop now at everlane.com
Veja creates stylish, world-renowned sneakers using ecological materials like organic cotton, wild rubber from the Amazon rainforest, and fabric made from recycled plastic bottles. The brand is committed to transparent production and partners directly with cooperatives that ensure fair pay.
Shop now at veja-store.com
A certified B Corp, Kotn produces high-quality basics made from authentic Egyptian cotton sourced directly from smallholder farms in the Nile Delta. The brand ensures fair pay and safe conditions for farmers and factory workers and funds projects to build schools in its farming communities.
Shop now at kotn.com
Razys keeps its prices low by using cheap, synthetic materials made from fossil fuels and manufacturing in countries where labor is severely underpaid. Its high-volume production model also lowers costs per item, but this affordability comes at a significant ethical and environmental price.
Yes, Razys frequently faces accusations of copying designs from both high-end fashion houses and small, independent creators. This practice is central to their fast fashion business model, which focuses on swiftly replicating popular trends for mass consumption rather than investing in original design work.
No, there is little evidence of meaningful sustainability improvements. While Razys has set a vague goal to reduce emissions, it has not published a clear plan, shown measurable progress, or adopted third-party certifications to verify its claims. Its core business practices remain fundamentally unsustainable.
