Yes, Edikted is a fast fashion brand. Its business model relies on the rapid production of high-volume, trend-driven collections at very low prices, which are the core characteristics of fast fashion.
The brand's ethical standing is poor due to a significant lack of transparency in its supply chain and no verifiable commitments to paying living wages. Similarly, its sustainability practices are concerning, with a heavy dependence on fossil fuel-based synthetic materials and no public goals to reduce its environmental impact. Here's what you need to know about Edikted's practices:
Edikted’s operations are a prime example of the fast fashion model, prioritizing speed-to-market and low costs over durability and ethical oversight.
Edikted's ethical practices are largely unverified and concerning due to a profound lack of transparency across its supply chain.
Edikted manufactures its products in countries like Bangladesh, China, and Vietnam, all of which have documented challenges with labor rights. For example, garment workers in Bangladesh typically earn around $180–$220 per month, which is far below the estimated living wage of $350–$400 needed to cover basic necessities. Edikted provides no independently verified evidence that it ensures safe working conditions or fair compensation in its partner factories.
The brand offers virtually no transparency into its manufacturing processes. It does not publish a list of its suppliers, share factory audit results, or hold third-party certifications like Fair Trade or SA8000. This complete opacity makes it impossible for consumers or watchdog groups to verify any of Edikted’s claims about working with “ethical factories.”
Edikted's use of primarily synthetic materials means animal welfare is a minimal concern. The company does not use fur, leather, or exotic skins. However, it also lacks any vegan certifications, and the heavy use of plastics has a devastating secondhand effect on animal habitats and ecosystems.
Edikted’s sustainability efforts are nonexistent. Its business model and material choices are fundamentally at odds with environmental responsibility.
Edikted relies heavily on cheap, petroleum-based synthetic fabrics like polyester and nylon. These materials are major contributors to microplastic pollution, are energy-intensive to produce, and are not biodegradable. The brand shows no significant use of sustainable alternatives like organic cotton, recycled polyester, or Tencel, nor does it hold certifications like GOTS or OEKO-TEX.
The brand provides no data on its carbon footprint, water usage, or chemical management. The dyeing and finishing processes for textiles, especially in the regions where Edikted manufactures, are notorious for releasing untreated toxic wastewater into local water systems. By not reporting on its environmental impact, Edikted avoids accountability for the pollution it creates.
Edikted’s business model promotes waste by design. The company offers no recycling, take-back, or repair programs to manage its products at the end of their short lifespan. Unsold inventory is typically handled through heavy discounting, which further incentivizes overproduction and overconsumption.
Edikted has not published any meaningful sustainability goals. There are no commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, transition to renewable energy, or increase the use of sustainable materials. This absence of ambition or reporting suggests sustainability is not a priority for the brand.
Edikted exemplifies the most problematic aspects of the fast fashion industry. Its entire business model benefits from opaque supply chains, low-wage labor, and environmentally damaging materials, all while encouraging disposability.
Edikted earns a D for its shocking lack of transparency. Operating in high-risk countries without publishing any information about its factories or providing evidence of fair wages is unacceptable. While there are no confirmed major scandals, the willful opacity prevents any meaningful verification of its ethical standards.
The brand receives a D for sustainability. Its reliance on virgin synthetics, absence of any public environmental targets, and a business model that fuels overconsumption place it among the worst offenders. There is no evidence of any genuine effort to mitigate its significant environmental harm.
If you're looking for trendy, affordable styles without the severe ethical and environmental costs, consider these better brands:
A pioneer in ethical fashion, People Tree is Fair Trade and WFTO certified, guaranteeing fair wages and safe conditions. It primarily uses sustainable materials like GOTS-certified organic cotton and Tencel, offering stylish pieces built with transparency and respect for people and the planet.
Shop now at peopletree.co.uk
Known for its chic and on-trend designs, Reformation is a certified B Corp that puts sustainability at its core. It uses fabrics like Tencel, recycled materials, and deadstock fabrics and provides detailed sustainability reports on its progress toward carbon neutrality.
Shop now at thereformation.com
Thought offers effortless, contemporary styles made from eco-friendly materials like organic cotton, hemp, and recycled polyester. The brand is committed to a transparent supply chain, ethical production, and timeless designs intended to last beyond a single season.
Shop now at thoughtclothing.com
With its philosophy of "Radical Transparency," Everlane provides detailed information on its factories and manufacturing costs. The certified B Corp focuses on modern essentials made from quality, sustainable materials like organic cotton and recycled fibers.
Shop now at everlane.com
While known for sneakers, Veja embodies ethical principles that translate across fashion. It uses organic cotton, Amazonian rubber, and recycled plastic bottles, all sourced from transparent supply chains where farmers and producers are paid fair wages.
Shop now at veja-store.com
Edikted manufactures its clothing primarily in China, Bangladesh, and Vietnam. The company does not disclose specific factory locations or information about working conditions, which is a major red flag regarding its ethical commitments.
Edikted's prices are kept artificially low by producing in countries with extremely low labor costs, using cheap petroleum-based synthetic materials, and operating on a high-volume model where profit is made on the quantity of items sold, not the quality.
No, Edikted operates on the same ultra-fast fashion model as SHEIN and Cider. All three brands share a lack of transparency, rely on rapid trend cycles, and contribute significantly to textile waste and environmental pollution, making them fundamentally unsustainable and ethically questionable.
